The Journal

Why Deeply Trained Therapists Undercharge, and What Fixes It

You did the training. All of it. More than was asked of you. And still you train. Deeper you go.

The years, the case consultations, the supervision hours, the weekend intensives you paid for out of your own pocket because you wanted to be good at this, not just qualified to do it.

And you are still charging less than you're worth.

If that sentence landed somewhere in your chest, you are not alone, and you are not broken. This is one of the most consistent patterns I see across highly trained therapists and practitioners, across modalities, across countries, across levels of experience. The more skilled someone becomes at holding other people's pain, the harder it often is for them to state their own price without flinching.

I'd love to share why I think this happens, because most of the advice out there treats it like a confidence problem. Raise your rates. Believe in your worth. Stop being scared. None of that touches the real mechanism.

This isn't a confidence problem. It's a parts problem.

If you're IFS trained, you already have the language for this, so I'll use it. If you're not, stay with me, because the pattern will still make sense.

There is almost always a part of a therapist that manages the fee conversation. It might sound like: don't price people out. It might sound like: I shouldn't profit from someone's pain. It might sound like: what if I charge this and they say no and I feel the shame of that.

This part isn't wrong to exist. It formed for a reason. Many of us came into this work because we are genuinely, deeply moved by suffering, and a part of us learned early that being helpful, being available, being the one who gives more than we take, was how we stayed safe or loved or good. That part has kept you kind. It has also, consistently, kept you underpaid.

Underneath the managing part, there is often something more vulnerable. A belief that says: if I charge what this is actually worth, I am being greedy. Or: my worth is conditional on how much I give away. For therapists who came from clinical or medical training environments, there is frequently an additional layer: money and healing were taught as separate categories, almost morally opposed. I began my own clinical training journey in the NHS (the UK's public health system, a British paragon of virtue), so I really do get this one. My first (utterly amazing) clinical supervisor was actually told initially that she couldn't lecture on my graduate programme, because she was in private practice not in public service.

So I more than get it. You were trained to care. You were not trained to charge.

Why deeply trained practitioners are hit hardest

Here's the part that often surprises people - especially those who don't work in our field. It is not the newly qualified therapist who struggles most with this. It's the ones with the deepest training. The ones who have done Level 3 IFS, who are EMDR certified, who have completed all the phases and masterclasses of Brainspotting or Somatic Experiencing training, who could easily justify premium fees on paper.

The more skilled you become, the more you can see how much is happening beneath the surface of every session. You know the complexity. You know what you're actually holding. And instead of that knowledge translating into confidence around fees, it often translates into a heightened sense of responsibility that makes charging more feel even riskier. The stakes feel higher because the work is deeper. And you're often surrounded by a loving echo chamber… of practitioners doing the exact same thing!

This is the paradox I see again and again: the more genuinely capable you are of doing profound work, the more likely you are to price it as though it were basic.

What actually shifts this

Not a pep talk. Not a spreadsheet. The work that actually shifts a therapist's relationship to money is the same work you already know how to do with clients: getting curious about the part that's driving the behaviour, rather than trying to override it with willpower.

When a therapist can sit with the part that fears charging more, actually ask it what it's afraid would happen, actually hear what it's protecting, something changes that no amount of “just raise your rates” advice ever touches. The fee conversation stops being a fight with yourself and starts being a simple, steady statement of what the work costs.

I have watched this shift happen in my own practice, and I have watched it happen for the therapists I've worked with. It is not overnight, and it is not about becoming someone who doesn't care about access or affordability. Some of the most values-led therapists I know have gone on to charge premium fees precisely because they resolved this internal conflict rather than suppressing it.

If this is landing

If you recognise yourself in this, and you're a therapist or deeply trained practitioner working in IFS, EMDR, Brainspotting, Somatic Experiencing, or any depth-oriented modality, this is exactly the work I created Permission to Expand to address. It's a personalised, IFS-informed audio coaching session designed to meet the specific part of you that manages your pricing, not to ask you to ignore it, but to actually understand it.

You didn't train this deeply to keep charging like you're a beginner.

If this is the pattern you recognise, Permission to Expand was built to meet the part of you that manages your pricing.

Book Permission to Expand